Cllr Strickland Takes The Low Road

Dear All,

It has come to our attention that a fairly pointed campaign is taking place, emanating from the offices of Cllr Strickland, against HTHAS. We’d like to make the mild assumption that if you signed the petition, you’re a kind-of/sort-of member/supporter of HTHAS so this applies to you too. We don’t usually take such a breezy tone in our posts, but challenging Cllr Strickland has become tiresome, and so we amuse ourselves.

Let’s take a look, shall we?

First came this:

Hornsey Town Hall Appreciation Society (HTHAS) was set up by a number of residents to challenge the Council’s plans on Hornsey Town Hall in opposition to the work of the community-led Hornsey Town Hall Creative Trust

  • HTHAS was not set up in opposition to the work of HTHCT. All of our campaigning has taken as its cue the results of HTHCT’s public consultation – the one where 50% asked for an Arts Centre and community use, and 0.37% suggested a hotel. If anything, we’re championing HTHCT’s own work.

and this

HTHAS….were involved in the rival bid in the Council’s procurement process to find a future operator for the Town Hall. There are therefore not happy at all that the procurement process recommended the other bidder!

  • We were not “involved” in the unsuccessful bid. We met with them, true. We also met with the successful bid. We’re are not “involved” with them either. Assuming that by the words “There are” Cllr Strickland meant “they”re” unhappy, he’s got us there (haha). We are not happy at a hotel solution because the consultations told us no-one wanted one, and it’s our role to defend as far as possible what the community say they want.

Then came this

I am aware that Hornsey Town Hall Appreciation Society were involved in the unsuccessful bid and therefore have a clear interest in one proposal over another, but the Council’s role is to take a fair view.

  • Cllr Strickland makes three points here: firstly that we were “involved” in the unsuccessful bid (again); secondly that we have a “clear interest” in one bid v another; and thirdly that Council’s role is to take a fair view – implying that others do not. The first point we address above. The second is a veiled suggestion that we have something to gain. This is both untrue and offensive, and should be retracted. Third, that only Council take a fair view…presumably that means the rest of us do not/cannot?

And most lately this

I would ask you not to listen to the propaganda from Dave Winskill and the Appreciation Society, which I hardly need to tell you is not accurate.

  • That’s dismissive to the point of sneering. Also needs retraction.

And this

That’s why I will not be agreeing to demands from a Lib Dem campaign group for a month’s delay. It serves no purpose  and is driven by party politics

  • We hope everyone can understand reasonable people from across the political spectrum joining together in common cause. The truth is, personally, I don’t know most of the others members’ political affiliations. Never asked. Don’t care. Not the point. Out here in the community, it doesn’t usually count for much.

We wonder whether the rest of Council is happy to have Cllr Strickland speak on their behalf in this manner.

Here are copies of the actual emails:

Email from Cllr Strickland to Cllr Hearn – copied to Cllrs Doron, Arthur, Elliot, Mann, Jogee, Weston, Sahota, Gallagher, Kober, Catherine West MP, Mayor Sadiq Khan, Joanne McCartney GLA

Email from Cllr Strickland to Cllr Ejiofor

And, of course, here’s the petition: 38Degrees Petition

7 Replies to “Cllr Strickland Takes The Low Road”

  1. Donald Trump is principally known for his misogyny, sexual assaults on women, his support for Putin and his terrifying right wing politics. Comparing a Haringey councillor to him is inept, hyperbolic defamation. Can we please keep this debate on the realm of reality?

  2. Hi Linda, We certainly didn’t mean to tar Cllr Strickland with those serious allegations, more to the most recent spate of his claims that everything/everyone is out to get him in some massive propaganda-led conspiracy. This has been the most breezy of our posts, and hoped it would be seen as such – just a bit cheeky.

    You are right, though. I’ll change the title of it right away.

  3. This is what is on the email reply from Cllr Strickland.
    I will be emailing back asking for clarification.

    “I am aware that Hornsey Town Hall Appreciation Society were involved in the unsuccessful bid and therefore have a clear interest in one proposal over another, but the Council’s role is to take a fair view.”

  4. You know what? This is libelous to the extreme – We could take the council to court for items #1 and #2.

    “Hornsey Town Hall Appreciation Society (HTHAS) was set up by a number of residents to challenge the Council’s plans on Hornsey Town Hall in opposition to the work of the community-led Hornsey Town Hall Creative Trust”

    AND

    “HTHAS….were involved in the rival bid in the Council’s procurement process to find a future operator for the Town Hall. There are therefore not happy at all that the procurement process recommended the other bidder!”

    Both are complete fabrications in order to taint the HTHAS – I am profoundly shocked by this. Despicable.

    Can someone liaise with Catherine West on this?

    This is truly insane.

    I will have a word with some councillors.

    Best JC

    1. Just to remind people that the Hornsey Town Hall Community Trust was actually set up and sponsored by Haringey Council, and its members were selected (veted?) by them also. So references to it as “independent” or “community-led” could be seen as a little disingenuous, possibly.

  5. Apologies if I sound dim but given the council is Mr Strickland a Labour Councillor? If so then I think there should be a mass write-in to Jeremy Corbyn’s office and Momentum also needs to be involved (I am not a member of either Momentum or Labour). If Jeremy Corbyn is serious about doing politics differently the it has to start at council level.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *